Oct. 11 – Nov. 8, 2019
For this exhibition the gallery was imagined as an aviary, holding birds in the form of paintings, released there by the artist. Some congregated in small groups, some were more solitary, while others were caged. The impetus for transforming the gallery into an aviary came from reading Martin Heidegger’s commentary on Plato’s Theaetetus. In the latter text, Plato likens our memory to an aviary, a container in which we store experiences in the form of birds that we have captured and placed there. When released into this enclosure these experiences are forgotten; it is only when we enter the aviary and catch hold of a bird, that the past experience it represents is recalled.
The aviary Plato creates is in the form of a simile, an image which directs our understanding beyond what it depicts. The exhibition extended the scope of this simile, by making it concrete within the gallery. Like Plato’s aviary, the gallery was understood as a container, which holds birds, specifically pigeons. They were present as paintings depicting pigeons in a variety of circumstances; some appeared as caged, some in lofts and some in the sky.
These works are, in part, based upon lithographic prints contained in Fulton’s Book of Pigeons, a highly regarded volume from 1880 which attempts to document all the varieties of domestic pigeons then known to be extant. A copy of this publication was displayed in the gallery. Pigeons were also sonically present in the form of a recording of Olivier Messiaen’s 1929 prelude for piano: La Colombe (The Dove), a work in part based on Messiaen’s transcription of the songs of actual birds.
“Working together as a complex, intricate unison of forms, the three central components of this exhibition extend the aviary simile into the uncertain territory of the uncanny. Hampson’s paintings place birds at the border of their real and imagined habitats of dovecote and painting. While Fulton’s book illustrates a project of scientific classification, undercut by the ever more eccentric varieties (in terms of name and image) displayed there, Messiaen, who described La Colombe as “orange, veined with violet,” shifts attention towards a synaesthetic reading of his own work, substantially reframing one thing as another, sound as colour, the aural reconfigured as visual. In the end it is the viewer who must, in a consciously-engaged act of looking and listening, hold this exhibition to its double promise of presence and absence, to its vivid dialectic of containment and release.”